The fake conservatism of "centre-right" Fidesz

2013. január 16. 10:21

Bokros Lajos
Financial Times
Orbán’s government has eliminated most checks and balances and deliberately created a state no longer constrained by the rule of law.

"Founded as an anti-communist group in the 1980s, Fidesz certainly had the potential to establish itself as a centre-right movement, capable of sweeping away the corruption and inefficiencies of communism and helping to build a modern, efficient, Hungarian state. However, since it came to power in April 2010 Fidesz has implemented a strongly populist, nationalist, anti-market agenda. It has introduced punishing taxes on banks, energy utilities, telecom companies and big retailers. Since most of these sectors are dominated by foreign strategic investors – many of whom brought in their money and skills when the future of Hungary and central Europe was far from secure – these measures reveal a strong anti-foreign and anti-market bias. The government justified its predatory taxes by claiming that financial firms and public utilities generate no value, but only expropriate and redistribute income earned elsewhere.

Far from being centre-right, this is an obsolete world view reflecting raw Marxist thinking, under which value is created only by agriculture and manufacturing. Services, the main source of growth, revenue and jobs in all developed economies, don’t contribute to social welfare in the Fidesz view. According to the government, the regime is constructing a new society 'based on labour'. Further, while making an all-out effort to gain EU funding to underpin investment, the prime minister has repeatedly claimed that the western model of free markets has failed and that new ideas can only come from the east. By this he clearly means state capitalism and 'managed democracy' a la Putin.

Orbán’s government has eliminated most checks and balances and deliberately created a state no longer constrained by the rule of law. In 2011, Fidesz unilaterally drafted and adopted a new constitution which largely abolished the independence of the judiciary, curtailed civil liberties, restricted media freedom and subordinated all non-governmental but state organisations to political control, including the Constitutional Court, the Media Council, the State Audit Office, the Fiscal Council, the Competition Office, the Financial Supervisory Authority, etc. Is it typical of a classical conservative party in the western European tradition to cherish illiberal democracy, destroy checks and balances, and abolish the rule of law?"

Az eredeti, teljes írást itt olvashatja el.

Összesen 48 komment

Jelenleg csak a hozzászólások egy kis részét látja.
Hozzászóláshoz és a további kommentek megtekintéséhez lépjen be, vagy regisztráljon!

A kommentek nem szerkesztett tartalmak, tartalmuk a szerzőjük álláspontját tükrözi.

why?
it is an English text that we read and comment.
for me it's normal to comment in English for a text written in English.
If someone doesn't know English at least basically in order to comment, so how could he read the original text anyway?

In my opinion the main goal of this forum is not a discussion between the members, but to reflect to the text.

Finally, it is possible that someone foreigner read this text and would like to join to the discussion. Why not?

It's similar to the texts in French or German of this forum.
Let's take the possibility to express and explain our point of view, our opinion to others, especially in other countries.

Válaszok:
Csigorin | 2013. január 16. 13:33

and a last remark:
if someone here in abroad (cause i'm working in Paris) would ask some silly question about 'the situation' in Hungary, I could calmly tell him: listen, there is no 'situation', it's just a lie of a few rubbish politician who use any possibility to act against the will of our people. If you are really interested about the truth, just go to this page, it is a public news forum, there are English, or French articles as well, you can read below the reactions and comments of Hungarians. You will fast notice that the majority denies these lies, and has a very bad opinion about these persons.

Auf Englisch bitte sehr :)

Scis-ne Latine? Quod dixerat Cicero? O tempora, o mores...
Ceterum dico et dicam: Bokros merga ist.

Válaszok:
Csigorin | 2013. január 16. 14:38

Illud dicere volui: Bokros merga est.

'anti semitic' feltehetően anti-Semitic akar lenni, de 'sovinist' mit jelent?

Válaszok:
Csigorin | 2013. január 16. 14:58

it supposed to be 'chauvinist' I think...

but who we are to not forgive this little nothing to the six languages speaking economist-Genius :)))))

Válaszok:
Csigorin | 2013. január 16. 15:02

o, sorry, i thought that it was Bokros... but apparently he is not SO idiot :)

Hozzászóláshoz és a további kommentek megtekintéséhez lépjen be, vagy regisztráljon!

Bejelentkezés